Commonsense Causal Reasoning between Short Texts
نویسندگان
چکیده
Commonsense causal reasoning is the process of capturing and understanding the causal dependencies amongst events and actions. Such events and actions can be expressed in terms, phrases or sentences in natural language text. Therefore, one possible way of obtaining causal knowledge is by extracting causal relations between terms or phrases from a large text corpus. However, causal relations in text are sparse, ambiguous, and sometimes implicit, and thus difficult to obtain. This paper attacks the problem of commonsense causality reasoning between short texts (phrases and sentences) using a data driven approach. We propose a framework that automatically harvests a network of causal-effect terms from a large web corpus. Backed by this network, we propose a novel and effective metric to properly model the causality strength between terms. We show these signals can be aggregated for causality reasonings between short texts, including sentences and phrases. In particular, our approach outperforms all previously reported results in the standard SEMEVAL COPA task by substantial margins.
منابع مشابه
Toward Annotating Commonsense Inferences in Text: INCOMPLETE DRAFT
The objective of the TACIT (Toward Annotating Commonsense Inferences in Text) project is to identify all or most of the commonsense inferences needed to understand a small collection of short narrative texts; to characterize those inferences in terms of features in different dimensions; and to characterize the commonsense knowledge that underlies those inferences. The primary purpose of this an...
متن کاملQualitative Spatial Reasoning in Interpreting Text and Narrative
Simple natural language texts and narratives often raise problems in commonsense spatial knowledge and reasoning of surprising logical complexity and geometric richness. In this paper, I consider a dozen short texts — five taken from literature, the remainder contrived as illustrations — and discuss the spatial reasoning involved in understanding them. I conclude by summarizing their common fea...
متن کاملCommonsense Causal Reasoning Using Millions of Personal Stories
The personal stories that people write in their Internet weblogs include a substantial amount of information about the causal relationships between everyday events. In this paper we describe our efforts to use millions of these stories for automated commonsense causal reasoning. Casting the commonsense causal reasoning problem as a Choice of Plausible Alternatives, we describe four experiments ...
متن کاملReasoning About Actions: Steady Versus Stabilizing State Constraints
In formal approaches to commonsense reasoning about actions, the Ramification Problem denotes the problem of handling indirect effects which implicitly derive from so-called state constraints. We pursue a new distinction between two kinds of state constraints which will be proved crucially important for solving the general Ramification Problem. Steady constraints never, not even for an instant,...
متن کاملA Commonsense Language for Reasoning about Causation and Rational Action
Commonsense causal discourse requires a language with which to express varying degrees of causal connectedness. This paper presents a commonsense language for reasoning about action and causation whose semantics is expressed by way of counterfactuals. Causal relations are analyzed along several dimensions including notions of resource consumption, degree of responsibility, instrumentality, and ...
متن کامل